Surface morphology

From aicamstir.com
Jump to navigation Jump to search

Surface morphology is a subset of analytical imaging to describe the macroscopic and microscopic appearance of the top surface friction stir welds

In some cases, high spatial resolution imaging made with sophisticated microscopes is used to produce images of products, samples and objects that cannot be seen with the naked eye.

FSW of steel

WC-based composite tool during FSW of Ni base alloy[1]

Friction stir welding (FSW) of Ni base alloy and of carbon steel was conducted during the development of WC-based composite tools for FSW of high-softening-temperature materials at the Prince Sattam Bin Abdulaziz University in Saudi Arabia and the Suez University in Egypt et al.[1]

FSW tool parts after consolidation, grinding for the required geometries and insertion in the tool holder[1]

The FSW tool was made from WC-based composites with 5 wt% Ni and 2.5 wt% Y2O3.[1]

FSW of Ni base alloy using WC-Co-TaC-NbC tool with 2.5 wt-percent Y2O3 and 5 wt-percent[1]

A visually acceptable weld shows a homogeneous surface from the start to the stop. The annealing colors above the heat affected zone are superficial colorations that result from the application of heat. They can be used on some materials such as stainless steels and copper alloys to assess and monitor the heat input during and even after FSW.

FSW of Ni base alloy using WC-Co-TaC-NbC tool with 2.5 wt-percent Y2O3 and 5 wt-percent[1]

If large surface breaking voids, as at the start of this weld, or small surface breaking voids are visible, as at near the middle of this weld, the weld does not meet the acceptance criteria described in ISO 25239-1:2020(en) — Part 5: Quality and inspection requirements, which is, strictly speaking, only applicable to aluminium.[2]

Preliminary image processing of surface breaking voids in FSW of Ni base alloy using the Fuzzy Select Tool (Magic Wand) in GiMP 2.10

Image processing with Fuzzy Select Tool (Magic Wand) in GIMP 2.10 (GNU Image Manipulation Program). This is a pixel-based graphics software that includes functions for image editing and digital painting of raster graphics. The programm can be downloaded and used free of charge. Several YouTube videos are available, which explain its main features.

FSW of Ni base alloy using WC-Co-TaC-NbC tool with 2.5 wt-percent Y2O3 and 5 wt-percent[1]

When welding carbon steel the annealing colors are less visible as shown here on a weld that shows some surface anomalities at the start.

Flash generation during FSW of 7050-T651

Visually acceptable weld in 10mm thick aluminum alloy 7050 as-cast plates

A study on friction stir welding of 10mm thialuminum-scandium alloy 7050-T651 castings (Al–5.6Zn–2.5Mg–1.6Cu) alloyed with 0.12 wt.% scandium was conducted at University of Applied Sciences of Southern Switzerland. The welds were made at a travel speed of 140 mm/min. The pin length was approximately 9.5 mm and the rotation speed was 240 rpm. Weld A was made as cast with acceptable visual appearance.[3]

Flash generation during FSW of 10mm thick artificially aged aluminum alloy 7050-T651 plates

Flash was expelled, while making weld A' in the artificially aged T651 condition.

Flash generation during FSW of 10mm thick aluminum alloy 7050-T651 plates

The flash was different on the advancing and retreating side of the weld. Gerenerating excessive flash is not a problem per se, as the flash can easily be removed with a milling cutter in the FSW machine or a grinding wheel of a manually operated angle grinder. However, in some cases excessive flash might be an indication for undercut, i.e. the weld being thinner than the plates, or for the pin being damaged by contacting the backing bar.

Flash generation during FSW of 10mm thick aluminum alloy 7050-T651 plates

Above photo shows the flash from a different point of view. Therefore, some FSW machines have several cameras installed, e.g. one in front of the FSW tool and two behind the FSW tool (looking at the weld from above and at an angle).

Deformation of the start region of friction stir welded 10mm thick aluminum alloy 7050-T651 plates

Significant deformation occured in the start region of the weld, so that the unwelded region is clearly visible in the area, which had not been stirred by the traversing pin.

Dissimilar materials: 3mm thick Al 7075-T6 to pure copper

FSW of 3mm thick Al 7075-T6 to pure copper, © Emre Kaygusuz, Bingöl University, CC BY-SA 4.0[4]
FSW of 3mm thick Al 7075-T6 to pure copper, © Emre Kaygusuz, Bingöl University, CC BY-SA 4.0[4]

Surface morphology and tunnel void defects in Bobbin FSW of layered plasticine

Bobbin FSW of plasticine at the top and aluminium at the bottom[5]

Abbas Tamadon, Dirk J. Pons and Don Clucas of Department of the Mechanical Engineering, University of Canterbury, Christchurch 8140, New Zealand investigated the potential position for tunnel defects within the structure of bobbin-tool friction stir welds by analogue modelling, to explain the origins of the formation mechanism of a typical tunnel void in the weld region. The welding process was simulated on layered plasticine slabs instead, compared to the aluminum plates. Observations in the modelled structure showed a high possibility for a continuous channelled discontinuity, like a tunnel-shaped void defect, in the entry zone of the weld, which mirrors the metal welding. The anatomy of tunnel defect in the entry zone was explained according to the mechanics of material during the plastic deformation process.

Instead of aluminum plates, analogue modelling of FSW was performed using colored layers and grids of plasticine. This provides easier flow visualization compared to the metallographic measurements of the aluminum welds. The objective is to see if it is possible to replicate the defect structures known to exist for aluminum plate welding. By fabrication of a plate comprising multiple layers of different colors, external area examination during and after the bobbin-tool FSW process, and subsequent post processing by cutting and viewing the cross-sections, can provide new insights into a flow-based model for the weld process.[5]

Bobbin FSW of plasticine, analogue weld sample and 3D printed Bobbin tool[5]

For better visualization of the welding process, multi-layered plasticine slabs were used as the weld workpieces. Different colors of plasticine manufactured by New Clay Products–(Gordon Harris Ltd., London, UK), were rolled to a uniform thickness of approximately 1.25 mm by a cylinder-shaped roller and using glycerine as the lubricant. Layers of different colors of plasticine were stacked on top of each other to create the test piece thickness of 10 mm. The slabs were subjected to heat treatment to improve the adhesion between the layers and also to diffuse the remained glycerine between the layers. The blocks were held at a temperature of 60 °C for a period of two hours. The hot blocks of plasticine cooled gradually to −4 °C as it was used for the processing in the room temperature. To validate the plasticine analogue, an aluminum plate also was welded by a Bobbin tool made from H13 tool steel.

They used a 3D printed Bobbin tool made from plastic with the same geometry features that those of an H13 steel tool used for aluminium welding, to visualize deformation and joining of the material in an analogue model. The method is applicable to identify the flow characteristic of the weld and present probable formation mechanism of the discontinuity defects for the processed material. The reported results point out a very strong model based on the flow visualization by the plasticine analogue during the friction stir welding process. Results show that the main reason for the tunnel defect is the instability of the plastic deformation during the entering of the tool into the body of the workpiece material at the entry zone. This highly plastic embedding occurs with the ejection of material as a spray in the entry zone of the weld and consequently, the tunnel defect is left in the place of the material loss. By identification of the origins of the void formation, it was concluded that a defect-free weld should be able to establish the uniform flow integrity within the stirring zone. This can result in a stable mass refilling process at the trailing edge of the tool, where the mass deposition forms the weld seam with no discontinuity flaw within the bonding layers.[5]

More photos required, please

We are currently searching for photos of the surfaces of friction stir welds, ideally made at five different welding conditions:

  • Far too cold (generating surface void and risk of shearing off the pin) - welding speed much too fast and rotation speed much too low
  • Too cold (an internal void can be assumed from looking at the surface) - welding speed too fast and rotation speed too low
  • Just right - optimised welding conditions to achieve high-strength welds
  • Too hot (uneven surface) - welding speed too slow and rotation speed too high
  • Far too hot (blisters and a lot of flash) - welding speed much too slow and rotation speed much too high

We want to use them to train an automated image processing system to detect wrong parameters and re-adjust them either during welding or before making the next weld.

See also

References

  1. 1.0 1.1 1.2 1.3 1.4 1.5 1.6 Mohamed M. Z. Ahmed, Waheed S. Barakat, Abdelkarim Y. A. Mohamed 3, Naser A. Alsaleh and Omayma A. Elkady: The Development of WC-Based Composite Tools for Friction Stir Welding of High-Softening Temperature Materials. Metals 2021, 11, 285, https://doi.org/10.3390/met11020285, CC BY 4.0.
  2. ISO 25239-5:2020(en) Friction stir welding — Aluminium — Part 5: Quality and inspection requirements.
  3. Photos and information provided by Christian S. Paglia, Director of the Institute of Materials and Construction, Supsi, Switzerland.
  4. 4.0 4.1 Çakan, A., Ugurlu, M., Kaygusuz, E. (2019): Effect of weld parameters on the microstructure and mechanical properties of dissimilar friction stir joints between pure copper and the aluminum alloy AA7075-T6. Materials Testing 61(2):142-148 DOI: 10.3139/120.111297.
  5. 5.0 5.1 5.2 5.3 Abbas Tamadon, Dirk J. Pons and Don Clucas: Structural Anatomy of Tunnel Void Defect in Bobbin Friction Stir Welding, Elucidated by the Analogue Modelling. Department of Mechanical Engineering, University of Canterbury, Christchurch 8140, New Zealand. Appl. Syst. Innov. 2020, 3, 2; doi:10.3390/asi3010002.